Last Updated on November 1, by LawEuro. It may be subject to editorial revision. The case originated in an application no. The applicant was represented by Ms S.
The applicant alleged, in particular, that the domestic authorities had failed to comply with their procedural obligations under Article 4 of the Convention as regards her allegations of being forced into and exploited through prostitution. The applicant was born in and lives in Z.
Owing to problems in her family, between and she lived with a foster family. Then she moved to a public home for children and young persons,where she stayed until she completed her professional training as a waiter. On 27 September the applicant lodged a criminal complaint with the Z.
He had given her a mobile telephone so that clients could contact her and had driven her to meet clients in various places. He had also forced her to give sexual services in the flat where they had lived together.
During that whole period she had been under the control of T. When she had refused to give sexual services to other men, hehad physically punished her. After she had left him, he had threatened her and her family and had attempted to contact her through a social-networking website. The criminal record of T. He was released from prison on a conditional leave in May and the conditional leave expired in June The Z.
